City Council dais, 4 Nov 2024 — Mayor Juan Antonio Banales, Councilmember Shanelle Scales-Preston, and Councilmember Dionne Adams

File PBG·DC · Compiled 4 Jun 2026 · V2

Investigative Dossier — Public Record

Who Moved It Forward

The data center on the former Delta View Golf Course — a decade of votes, options, and one continuous land deal (2016–2026), traced through official minutes, adopted resolutions, and meeting video. 2016 - 2026.

The dais, 4 Nov 2024. Mayor Juan Antonio Banales, Councilmember Shanelle Scales-Preston, and Councilmember Dionne Adams the night the Final Program EIR was certified. [V1]

76.38

Acres Entitled

99→500 MW

MW Buildout

$16.78M$10.5M

Land Sale Price

28

Official Actions Logged

01 · The Clean Answer

One Deal. Three Names. One Continuous Direction.

The former Delta View Golf Course closed on 1 Mar 2018. Eighteen days later, the City Council ordered staff to explore reuse. Thirteen weeks after that, the city signed a five-year option with a single data-center developer, EDS, the only company ever considered. No public bid, no competing offer, no alternative ever named.

The Developer Chain

012009

Discovery Builders

Albert Seeno III

36-month exclusive negotiating agreement for residential development on 422 acres (golf course + Stoneman Park). Lapsed without a deal.

lapsed
022016 – 2022

Energy Delivery Solutions

EDS · SteelRiver affiliate

EDS had worked with Pittsburg since the summer of 2016. Council approved a five-year option on 4 Jun 2018 (executed the next day), price pre-fixed at $16,779,312. On 7 Oct 2019 the window to exercise was extended to 4 Jun 2028. EDS was still the named CEQA applicant on the abandoned first EIR.

novation
032022 – present

AVAIO Digital Partners

via Pittsburg Land Holdings LLC

Acquired assets of EDS in early 2022. City executed a novation assigning the ENRA and option to AVAIO. The sale closed for $10.5 million$6.28 million under the price the city had locked in back in 2018 — with the note executed 30 Sept 2022, just ahead of the Surplus Land Act exemption deadline the whole structure was built around.

City Council called it a "Once-in-a-lifetime opportunity"

$16,779,312 — fixed with the $1 option in 2018, already flagged as uncompetitive. It didn't even hold: the city closed for $10.5 million, a further $6.28 million discount.

A Verified Negative

No other developer was ever publicly attached to the site — ten years, three names, one continuous deal.

Seller. Regulator. Power Vendor.

The City Council doubles as the board of the Pittsburg Power Company — making the city simultaneously the land seller, the land-use regulator, and the power vendor to the project.

The Two Constants

Two officials supported this project at every council stage from 2018 to 2024 — from the $1 option to full entitlement.

Jelani Killings — Today
Jelani Killings — 2018
2018Today

Jelani Killings

Councilmember → Vice Mayor

“[...] essentially building public trust in city government and improving our responsiveness to the needs of our community.”

pitching a new community-engagement committee in 2018

Confirmed votes

  • Jun 2018Yes on the EDS option
  • Jul 2022Moved the land sale
  • Nov 2024Moved the PEIR certification

As of Dec 2025, co-chairs the Data Center and Hydrogen Subcommittee (with Lopez; staff: Jordan Davis).

Juan Antonio Banales — Today
Juan Antonio Banales — 2018
2018Today

Juan Antonio Banales

Councilmember → Mayor

“When we decided six years ago to close the golf course, [...] the vision was economic development, job creators.”

explaining the 2018 golf-course closure, Nov 2024

Confirmed votes

  • Jun 2018Seconded the EDS option
  • Jul 2022Yes on the land sale
  • Nov 2024Yes on PEIR; gave the project's signature press quote

Mayor during the 4 Nov 2024 PEIR certification vote.

Who Else Moved It Forward

Six council members moved it forward. Two — the constants above — were there from the $1 option to entitlement. These four carried it at key moments:

Shanelle Scales-Preston

Councilmember → County Supervisor D5

Yes — Oct 2019 · Jul 2022 · Nov 2024

Dionne Adams

Councilmember → Mayor 2026

Yes — Nov 2024

Angelica Lopez

Councilmember → Vice Mayor 2026

Yes — Nov 2024

Arlene Kobata

PC Chair → Councilmember

Yes — Sept 2024 (Planning Commission)

Beyond the dais, staff spanned the EDS era into implementation, and building-trades speakers filled the podium in favor at every hearing. The only two NO votes ever cast came from the appointed Planning Commission — never from the council.

Meet the full cast of players

The Opposition

The only two NO votes. Planning Commissioners Elissa Robinson and Donna Smith (speaking). 10 Sept 2024.

The only two NO votes. Planning Commissioners Elissa Robinson and Donna Smith (speaking). 10 Sept 2024.

Sept 2024

Planning Commissioners Elissa Robinson and Donna Smith vote no — the only two NO votes ever cast on this project.

2024–25

The Center for Biological Diversity files a CEQA suit challenging the EIR. Settled for $750,000.

Apr 2026

An 18-group coalition files a BAAQMD petition over the project's 37 planned diesel generators.

02 · The Dialogue

Same Room, Different Story

What was said, by whom, in the same room — supporters and opponents, side by side, across the decade of meetings that got us here.

Act 1 · 2018

The Option

The same 4 Jun 2018 meeting where the council locked in the $1 five-year option — advocacy and pushback, minutes apart.

Wolfgang Croskey

Community member · 4 Jun 2018

The property was not marketed.

Sal Evola

Vice Mayor · 4 Jun 2018

It is the prerogative of this city council… to enter into exclusive rights to negotiate with developers of energy projects… When [residents] talk about the marketing of the property, it's our prerogative whether to market a property or not.

Darrell Foster

Community member · 4 Jun 2018

So they put a poll out there, and the poll overwhelmingly supported maintaining the golf course. But the city did the opposite. They closed the golf course. I think it was already pre-determined to do so… The public wants to be heard. They deserve to be heard… I do believe it would be irresponsible for the council to take action on this matter tonight.

Sal Evola

Vice Mayor · 4 Jun 2018

What did the poll say…? Approximately half wanted us to try to subsidize the golf course to keep it open… The other half... wanted us to explore diverse recreational opportunities as well as economic development, and that is what this item will allow.

Pete Longmire

Mayor · 4 Jun 2018

It would be more helpful and efficient if we knew your question in advance. That way, we can make sure the staff would answer any concerns that you may have.

Willie Mims

Community member · 4 Jun 2018

The people should have access to the people's business… To ask us to give you a question on a report that has not been presented to the people is a disservice to the people — that is denying the people access to the people's business.

Merl Craft

Councilmember

We can't afford to stay a community … only concerned about what an individual group is and not a regional approach.

Act 2 · 2022

The Sale

The quietest stretch of the decade — no hearings, no podium speakers, just paperwork.

From the record

Novation: EDS's assets acquired by AVAIO; the ENRA and option assigned to Pittsburg Land Holdings.

Sale closed at $10.5M — below the $16.78M publicized figure — just ahead of the Surplus Land Act exemption deadline.

No public testimony for or against is on record for this window.

Act 3 · 2024

The Entitlement

Same hearing, 10 Sept 2024 — a Building Trades rep calls it fruition; the City Treasurer calls the process a stranger to the town.

TH

Tom Hanson

Business Manager, IBEW Local 322 · 10 Sept 2024

The long-term plan that the council put in place in 2018 is coming to fruition today. To say no to it is saying no to a strong financial future with really good, strong economic development.

Nancy Parent

City Treasurer · 10 Sept 2024

I want you to know that the people who negotiated this, who were planning it, do not live in this town. Will not live in this town.

Jordan Davis

CED Director · 10 Sept 2024

30 employees is not a lot for a building this size… It does only have 30 jobs, but those are 30 highly skilled, high-paying jobs that could have potential downstream impacts on economic development.

Donna Smith

Planning Commissioner · 10 Sept 2024

You mentioned the employees… We're talking about one building that looks to be three to four stories high, that may have 30 employees in one… I'm seeing that the idea of the employees is not actually as big as we would think if these are in fact more warehouse use spaces — they don't need a lot of employees to run.

Frances Tinney

CBD Attorney

Putting a project like this so close to residential neighborhoods, a church, schools, and parks creates hazards.

From the record

Robinson cast the other of the project's only two NO votes at this same hearing — her stated reasoning is not found in the available meeting record.

Act 4 · 2024–25

The Reckoning

November 2024: confidence that future-phase impacts were already screened. December 2025: the city agrees to review them anyway.

Jelani Killings

Councilmember · Nov 2024

There are certain thresholds that have been identified, and none of them went above that significant level… So I do find a level of comfortability in that.

TS

The Settlement

CBD CEQA agreement · Dec 2025

Outcome

The City may not rely on the current EIR's conclusions for any Phase II–III warehouse/logistics center — separate review required.

Juan Antonio Banales

Mayor · Dec 2024

The City of Pittsburg and PPC have a long history of supporting innovative industrial uses, and we see these developments as the core of our workforce and economic development initiatives.

TE

The EIR's Own Assumptions

Planning Commission staff report · 10 Sept 2024

Outcome

30 jobs.

Shanelle Scales-Preston

City Council Member · Dec 2025

I think that part is really exciting for us to be able to have in our community as well as for our youth to have the potential to have jobs right here in our community. Therefore, I would be supporting this project.

Meredith Stevenson

CBD Attorney

Data centers pretend to be unassuming, but in fact they pose huge risks to the air quality and water supply of our communities.

Angelica Lopez

Councilmember · Nov 2024

I envision Pittsburg moving towards a Silicon Valley-type city… That might attract other types of businesses, including big retailers such as better grocery stores.

Act 5 · 2026

The People Find Out

Eight years after the option: regulators are petitioned in April; the public — finally aware — answers in June.

Apr 2026

An 18-group coalition petitions BAAQMD over the project's 37 planned diesel generators.

9 Jun 2026

20,000

signatures against the data center in two weeks — the majority from the Pittsburg area.

15 Jun 2026

300+

residents at the City Council meeting — more than 100 public comments, from people of all ages and backgrounds.

03 · The Record of Actions

The Record of Actions

All tallies are from official adopted minutes or resolutions unless noted. The six highlighted rows bound the deal: the 2017 exclusive negotiating rights agreement, the 2018 option, the 2022 sale, the 2024 General Plan redesignation, the 4-2 Planning Commission vote, and the 5-0 EIR certification.

02 · 1 Aug 2017negotiated agreement

Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (ENRA) signed with EDS, private, predates any public reuse process by seven months

Council + PPC · ENRA 1 Aug 2017
06 · 4 Jun 20185–0 unan.

Five-year option with EDS — 101.7 ac, $1 consideration for the option; tiered pricing totaling $16,779,312 if fully exercised

City Council · Minutes [M3]
12 · 18 Jul 20224–0 · White abs.

Purchase & Sale + seller-financed Note + Deed of Trust, $16,779,327.41. Killings moved, Craft seconded. Note executed 30 Sept 2022

City Council · Reso 22-14126
15 · 6 May 20244–0 · Lopez abs.

Adopt Envision Pittsburg 2040 General Plan — redesignates site Employment Center Industrial. Killings moved, Banales seconded. Parent spoke against

City Council · Minutes [M7]
17 · 10 Sept 20244–2

Recommend rezone + Specific Plan + Vesting Map + PEIR. Gordon moved, Foster seconded. Nays: Robinson, Smith — the only NO votes ever cast

Planning Comm. · PC Reso 10255
18 · 4 Nov 20245–0 both

Certify Final PEIR + MMRP + Vesting Map (Killings moved, Adams seconded); introduce rezone ordinance (Scales-Preston moved, Killings seconded). 13 for, 2 neutral, 3 against

City Council · Reso 24-14560
Key actionOnly split vote

Status as of June 2026

Fully entitled, CEC-exempted, settlement implemented, note restructured — but no publicly announced tenant, financing close, or groundbreaking. AVAIO's materials now say first occupancy 2027; analysts note Bay Area projects rarely start without a committed tenant.

04 · Settled vs. Still Open

What this round nailed down

Resolved this round

  • PSA resolution number (22-14126) and full adopted text with vote certification.

  • Actual 2022 sale price ($10.5M) confirmed by city staff — below the publicized $16.78M figure.

  • Surplus-land step (22-14051, 7 Feb 2022).

  • EDS → AVAIO transfer mechanics: asset acquisition + novation, early 2022.

  • Option execution (5 Jun 2018) and extension (to 4 Jun 2028).

  • Settlement-implementing council action (15 Dec 2025, item 22).

  • The 7 May 2018 “vote” was consensus direction — no formal vote was taken.

Still open — archival only

  • Underlying financial agreements and due-diligence records behind the $10.5M sale price (city compiling for release).

  • Resolution numbers for the 2018 option, 2018 PSA, and Oct 2019 amendments (scanned in OnBase — retrievable doc-by-doc).

  • The unverified “24-14463/64” General Plan numbers.

  • 15 Dec 2025 vote tally (minutes unpublished; video available).

  • Robinson's stated reasoning for her NO vote — not found in the available meeting record. Smith raised jobs-count and site-selection concerns on the record before voting no.

  • Campaign-finance filings (NetFile AID=PBG).

  • County Recorder deed and note instruments.

  • Delta Diablo board action on the will-serve.

Confidence note: Tallies, movers, seconders, and speaker lists for keystone actions are drawn from official adopted minutes or a resolution's vote certification — the highest tier. The EDS corporate links remain a strong inference; the 2009 Seeno ENA is single-source. The "since 2016" EDS relationship is now corroborated by both the East County Today report and the 4 Jun 2018 meeting video.

The one-line finding

A public golf course became a 500-megawatt data center site in one continuous deal — and the land was never put to market.

05 · The Cast of Players

Who was in the room

Every identification is nameplate-verified from official meeting video or an official government page.

Filter:

City Council

Jelani Killings

Jelani Killings

SUPPORTED

Councilmember → Vice Mayor

Yes on the 2018 EDS option, moved the 2022 land sale, and moved the Nov 2024 PEIR certification; now co-chairs the Data Center and Hydrogen subcommittee.

Confirmed votes

Jun 2018Jul 2022Nov 2024
Juan Antonio Banales

Juan Antonio Banales

SUPPORTED

Councilmember → Mayor

Seconded the 2018 EDS option and yes on every vote since; Mayor during the 4 Nov 2024 PEIR certification and gave the project's signature press quote.

Confirmed votes

Jun 2018Jul 2022Nov 2024
Shanelle Scales-Preston

Shanelle Scales-Preston

SUPPORTED

Councilmember → County Supervisor D5

Yes on 2019 amendments and 2022 sale; moved the 4 Nov ordinance introduction; still championing in Dec 2025.

Confirmed votes

Oct 2019Jul 2022Nov 2024
Dionne Adams

Dionne Adams

SUPPORTED

Councilmember → Mayor 2026

Seconded the 4 Nov 2024 PEIR motion; Mayor for the 2026 implementation phase.

Confirmed votes

Nov 2024
Angelica Lopez

Angelica Lopez

SUPPORTED

Councilmember → Vice Mayor 2026

Yes on 4 and 18 Nov 2024; co-chairs the 'Data Center and Hydrogen' subcommittee.

Confirmed votes

Nov 2024
Arlene Kobata

Arlene Kobata

SUPPORTED

PC Chair → Councilmember

Chaired the 4–2 Planning Commission, recommending the project; selected 13 Jan 2025 to fill the vacant council seat.

Confirmed votes

Sept 2024 (PC)

Staff, Developer, and Others

Jordan Davis

Jordan Davis

CITY STAFF

Community & Economic Dev. Director

The most-quoted advocate; signed the CBD settlement for the city; staffs the data-center subcommittee.

Mark McComiskey

Mark McComiskey

DEVELOPER

Co-Founder & CEO, AVAIO

Signs as President for both Pittsburg Data Hub LLC and AVAIO Digital Partners I — the entitlement entities.

John DeLacio

John DeLacio

DEVELOPER

Project Manager, AVAIO

Spoke in favor at the 4 Nov hearing; named real party in the CBD suit.

Sarah Foster

Sarah Foster

SUPPORTED

Planning Commission Vice-Chair

Seconded the motion recommending approval, 10 Sept 2024.

Bill Whitney

Bill Whitney

LABOR / FOR

CEO, CC Building & Construction Trades

Spoke in favor on 4 Nov 2024; backed the 2018 Project Stabilization Agreement.

Elissa Robinson

Elissa Robinson

VOTED NO

Planning Commissioner

One of the only two NO votes ever cast on the project, 10 Sept 2024.

Donna Smith

Donna Smith

VOTED NO

Planning Commissioner

The second NO vote on the 4–2 Planning Commission recommendation; questioned the low jobs count and why this site over existing industrial land.

Nancy Parent

Nancy Parent

OPPOSED

City Treasurer

Opposed industrial use of the golf-course site from the May 2024 General Plan vote onward; spoke against on 4 Nov.

Meredith Stevenson

Meredith Stevenson

LITIGANT

Attorney, Center for Biological Diversity

Co-counsel on the Dec 2024 CEQA petition; spoke against at the 4 Nov hearing.

Frances Tinney

Frances Tinney

LITIGANT

Attorney, Center for Biological Diversity

Co-counsel on the Dec 2024 CEQA petition; testified against the site's proximity to schools and homes, 10 Sept 2024.

Wolfgang Croskey

Wolfgang Croskey

PROCESS CRITIC

Resident / Process Critic

From 2018: "The property was not marketed." Logged as neutral by Nov 2024.

Sal Evola

Sal Evola

SUPPORTED

Vice Mayor, 2018

Moved the 2018 EDS option and defended the closed-session process as the council's prerogative to negotiate exclusively rather than market the property.

Merl Craft

Merl Craft

SUPPORTED

Councilmember, 2018

Voted yes in 2018, seconded the 2022 sale, and moved the Oct 2019 consent calendar carrying the PDA and option amendments.

Darrell Foster

Darrell Foster

OPPOSED

Community member, 2018

From 2018: "I think it was already pre-determined to do so."

Willie Mims

Willie Mims

OPPOSED

Community member, 2018

From 2018: objected that the council asked for public questions before the staff report was heard, denying access to the people's business.

TH

Tom Hanson

LABOR / FOR

Business Manager, IBEW Local 322

Spoke in favor at the 10 Sept 2024 hearing: the 2018 plan "coming to fruition."

A note on the record: Robinson's stated reasoning for her NO vote is not found in the available meeting record (Planning Commission event 1416); Smith raised jobs-count and site-selection concerns on the record before voting no — the official minutes are action-only either way. Vote marks show only what is explicitly confirmed in the public record. Where no verified portrait was available, initials stand in.

06 · Sources

The record this is built on

Official Minutes & Resolutions

M2Council minutes, 7 May 2018 — CivicClerk file 3291.
M3Council minutes, 4 Jun 2018 — file 3307.
M9Council minutes, 15 Oct 2018 — file 3096.
M4Council minutes, 7 Oct 2019 — file 3120.
M10Council minutes, 18 Jul 2022 — OnBase (OCR).
M7Council minutes, 6 May 2024 — file 1260.
M8Planning Commission minutes, 10 Sept 2024 — file 1329.
M5Council minutes, 4 Nov 2024 — file 1281.
M6Council minutes, 18 Nov 2024 — file 1284.
M11PPC board agenda, 16 Jun 2025 — Bell Burnett & Associates contract amendment.
M12Council agenda, 15 Dec 2025 — file 3804, item 22.
R1Resolution 22-14126 (adopted, certified, with recitals & vote), 18 Jul 2022 — OnBase legislative portal.

City of Pittsburg (Primary)

S1Tech Park project page + FAQ (Reso 24-14560, Ord 24-1527, ZA Resos 445/466, Final PEIR, Specific Plan).
S23Email, Jordan Davis, 29 Jun 2026 — “Fw: Request for Clarification …”

State (Primary)

S5CEQAnet SCH 2020040112 — 2020 NOP, applicant EDS.
S6CEQAnet SCH 2024030184 — 2024 PEIR.
S7CEQAnet SCH 2022040427 — 2040 General Plan NOD.
S8CEC Docket 24-SPPE-01 — backup generating facility.

Court / Legal (Primary)

S9CBD Verified Petition, 2 Dec 2024 — Case N24-2162.
S10Settlement agreement, 16 Dec 2025.
S18BAAQMD petition, 22 Apr 2026.
S20CBD press release, 2 Dec 2024.

Contemporaneous Press

S14East County Today, 7 Jun 2018 - EDS option; Wood / Evola / Craft / Croskey / Foster quotes; ”since 2016.”
S15Greenbelt Alliance — the 2009 Seeno ENA.
S21Contra Costa News — Kobata selection, 13 Jan 2025.
S2AVAIO milestone release, 3 Dec 2024 — Banales / McComiskey quotes.
S4AVAIO project page — Davis quote.
S11PRNewswire, 9 Dec 2025 — CEC approval; Scales-Preston / McComiskey quotes.
S22Pulse2 — McComiskey interview, June 2024.

Meeting Video

V14 Nov 2024 City Council — CivicClerk event 1385.
V210 Sept 2024 Planning Commission — event 1416.
V34 Jun 2018 City Council — CivicClerk event 2060.

Compiled June 2026 · v2 · Grounded in official minutes, adopted resolutions, and meeting video from the City's CivicClerk archive and OnBase legislative-records portal. Photography: frames from the City of Pittsburg's published public-record meeting recordings; official portraits as credited. End of dossier.